Assessing Efficiency and Image Quality of Dental Radiography Using Modified Dental Holders with Silicone Rubber Integration
Abstract
This study aims to evaluate the efficiency of use by radiographers and image quality in the use of dental holders that have been modified with silicone rubber in dental radiography procedures. Motivated by the problem in the use of conventional dental holders that often cause discomfort for patients and the potential for motion artifacts, a modification with silicone rubber was proposed. The study sample involved 16 repetitions on each head cadaver using both the innovative and control dental holders. The results of the paired t-test showed a significant difference in efficiency of use by radiographers and image quality between the two groups. The efficiency of use by radiographers increased, supported by a Cohen's d value of 9.632. The modification with silicone rubber showed better images, with a Cohen's d value of 0.325, attributed to the adjustable conus guide capability according to the size of the patient's mouth and jaw as well as the increased comfort with the silicone rubber material. This study recommends the adoption of the modified dental holder to improve procedure efficiency and quality of dental radiography results.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Iannucci, Joen, and Laura Jansen Howerton. 2016. Dental Radiography: A Workbook and Laboratory Manual.
Jannah, Marichatul, Radiodiagnostic Engineering, Poltekkes Kemenkes Semarang, and Central Java. 2021. “Innovation of Dental X-Ray Holder Using Silicone Rubber Coating in Posterior Dental Periapical Intraoral Examination.” JURNAL INFO KESEHATAN 19(1):28–37. doi: 10.31965/INFOKES.VOL19.ISS1.505.
Khator, Apurva, Mukta Motwani, and Anuraag Choudhary. 2017. “A Study for Determination of Various Positioning Errors in Digital Panoramic Radiography for Evaluation of Diagnostic Image Quality.” Indian Journal of Dental Research 28(6):666. doi: 10.4103/IJDR.IJDR_781_16.
Lewis, Creighton, Nicole Restauri, and Toshimasa Clark. 2019. “Strategies for Increasing Radiologist Efficiency.” Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology 48(2):103–4. doi: 10.1067/J.CPRADIOL.2018.12.001.
Mojsiewicz-Pienkowska, Krystyna, Marzena Jamrógiewicz, Katarzyna Szymkowska, and Dominika Krenczkowska. 2016. “Direct Human Contact with Siloxanes (Silicones) - Safety or Risk Part 1. Characteristics of Siloxanes (Silicones).” Frontiers in Pharmacology 7(MAY).
Nairz, Knud, Ingrid Böhm, Sebastiano Barbieri, Dieter Fiechter, Nicola Hošek, and Johannes Heverhagen. 2018. “Enhancing Patient Value Efficiently: Medical History Interviews Create Patient Satisfaction and Contribute to an Improved Quality of Radiologic Examinations.” PLOS ONE 13(9):e0203807. doi: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0203807.
Okano, Tomohiro, and Jaideep Sur. 2010. “Radiation Dose and Protection in Dentistry.” Japanese Dental Science Review 46(2):112–21. doi: 10.1016/J.JDSR.2009.11.004.
Park, Ye-Won, Cheong-Hwan Lim, Hong-Ryang Jung, Oh-Nam Yang, and Chang-Moo Bbaek. 2015. “Appropriate Inspection Distance of Digital X-Ray Imaging Equipment for Diagnosis.” Indian Journal of Science and Technology 8(Supplementary 8):1–7. doi: 10.17485/IJST/2015/V8IS8/70528.
Reynolds, Tim. 2016. Basic Guide to Dental Radiography. 1st ed. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.
Towbin, Alexander J., Laurie A. Perry, and David B. Larson. 2017. “Improving Efficiency in the Radiology Department.” Pediatric Radiology 47(7):783–92. doi: 10.1007/S00247-017-3828-7/METRICS.
Whaites, Eric, and Nicholas Drage. 2021. Essentials of Dental Radiography and Radiology, 6th Edition. 6th ed. Elsevier.
Yeung, Andy Wai Kan, and Natalie Sui Miu Wong. 2021. “Reject Rates of Radiographic Images in Dentomaxillofacial Radiology: A Literature Review.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2021, Vol. 18, Page 8076 18(15):8076. doi: 10.3390/IJERPH18158076.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31983/jrk.v12i2.10484
Article Metrics
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Jurnal Riset Kesehatan