AI Usage Policy
- Correcting grammar and sentence structure.
- Translating or paraphrasing text to enhance academic tone.
- Assisting in the search for relevant literature or sparking research ideas.
- Assisting with coding or basic data analysis (excluding data manipulation.
2. Strict Prohibitions on AI Use (AI-Generated)
The following actions are classified as serious violations of publication ethics:
- Non-Author Status: AI cannot be listed as a co-author, as it lacks legal personhood and cannot be held accountable for the journal's content.
- Data Fabrication: AI is prohibited from being used to generate new experimental data, manipulate scientific images, or falsify scientific facts.
- 100% AI-Generated Work: Producing an entire manuscript solely from AI prompts is strictly prohibited.
3. Transparency Obligations (AI Disclosure)
Authors are required to be honest and transparent regarding the AI tools they use.
- Specific Declaration: Authors must include a statement (e.g., in the Acknowledgments or Declaration of Generative AI section).
- Required Information: Specify the name of the technology used (e.g., ChatGPT, Gemini) and explain the specific sections or processes for which the tool was employed.
4. Accountability and Full Responsibility
- Author Responsibility: Human authors retain full responsibility for the accuracy of the data, analysis, interpretation, and conclusions of the publication.
- Risk of Hallucination: Given that AI is prone to "hallucinations" (generating false references or facts), authors are required to verify all AI-generated information.
5. Policies for Reviewers and Editors
AI policies also strictly apply to journal management:
- Reviewers are prohibited from uploading authors' manuscripts to public AI platforms (such as ChatGPT) for review purposes, as this violates the principle of publication confidentiality.
- Editors may only use AI for administrative purposes (such as plagiarism detection tools) and not for making final decisions regarding article acceptance.


