Focus and Scope

Buletin Keslingmas (p-ISSN : 0215-742X e-ISSN : 2655-8033) mencakup penelitian bidang Sanitasi/ Kesehatan Lingkungan yang meliputi

• penyehatan air,
• penyehatan udara,
• penyehatan makanan,
• penyehatan tanah dan pengelolaan sampah,
• pengendalian vektor,
• penyehatan sarana fasilitas umum,
• Sistem Informasi Kesehatan dan Keselamat Kerja,
• Epidemiologi Kesehatan Lingkungan

serta bidang disiplin ilmu Kesehatan Masyarakat.

Section Policies

Articles

Open Submissions

Indexed

Peer Reviewed

Peer Review Process

Artikel yang diserahkan ke Jurnal Buletin Keslingmas akan dievaluasi melalui 2 tahap tinjauan, pra-review dan review substansi.

Pra-review artikel ini dilakukan oleh tim editorial untuk meninjau kesesuaian artikel dengan fokus dan ruang lingkup jurnal serta gaya selingkung jurnal dan pedoman penulisan Buletin Keslingmas.

Review Substansi secara single-blind dilakukan oleh setidaknya 2 reviewer. Durasi peninjauan antara 3-12 minggu. Jika diinginkan, peninjau dapat meminta peninjauan ulang setelah penulis merevisi artikelnya.

Scaning plagiasme akan dilakukan oleh tim editor menggunakan fasilitas aplikasi plagiarisme

Dalam proses Penerbitan Jurnal Ilmiah dilakukan melalui beberapa tahapan yaitu:

1. Pengumpulan makalah
2. Proses evaluasi makalah oleh reviewer yang ditunjuk
3. Proses revisi makalah
4. Pengeditan makalah yang telah dinyatakan Accepted
5. Pengiriman hasil penyuntingan makalah kepada penulis untuk dilakukan proof read
6. Permintaan Assignment of Copyright dari penulis
7. Penerbitan jurnal ilmiah

Secara rinci, prosesnya adalah sebagai berikut :

1. Memasukkan data paper ke database
2. Mencetak lembar disposisi
3. Membuat arsip paper
4. Menentukan Reviewer paper
5. Mengirimkan paper ke referee untuk dievaluasi.
6. Mengirimkan pemberitahuan kepada penulis.
7. Mengirimkan referee report ke penulis untuk direvisi.
8. Meminta komentar lanjutan dai reviewer atas paper hasil revisi.
9. Jika paper masih harus direvisi, komentar lanjutan dikirimkan ke penulis.
10. Melakukan penyuntingan paper sesuai dengan format Proceedings.
11. Mengirimkan paper ke penulis untuk dilakukan final reading.
12. Melakukan final editing.
13. Menerbitkan jurnal.

ALUR PENGELOLAAN JURNAL ONLINE

Publication Frequency

Buletin Keslingmas (ISSN : 0215 - 742X) terbit empat kali setiap tahun: Maret, Juni, September dan Desember.

Open Access Policy

Jurnal ini menyediakan akses terbuka langsung ke konten pada prinsip bahwa melakukan penelitian tersedia secara bebas untuk umum mendukung pertukaran global yang lebih besar pengetahuan.

JURNAL INI BEBAS UNTUK DIAKSES

Archiving

This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...

Publication Ethics

Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement Buletin Keslingmas is a journal publish original research papers, review articles and case studies focused on includes research in the fields of sanitation / water sanitation, air health, food sanitation, soil sanitation / waste management, vector control, sanitation of facilities, Health and Safety, Epidemiology of Environmental Health. This following statement clarifies ethical behavior of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in this journal, including the author, the editor and the reviewer. This statement is based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.

Duties of Authors

1. Reporting Standards: Authors should present an accurate account of the original research performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Researchers should present their results honestly and without fabrication, falsification or inappropriate data manipulation. A manuscript should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Manuscripts should follow the submission guidelines of the journal.
2. Originality and Plagiarism: Authors must ensure that they have written entirely original work. The manuscript should not be submitted concurrently to more than one publication unless the editors have agreed to co-publication. Relevant previous work and publications, both by other researchers and the authors’ own, should be properly acknowledged and referenced. The primary literature should be cited where possible. Original wording taken directly from publications by other researchers should appear in quotation marks with the appropriate citations.
3. Multiple, Redundant, or Concurrent Publications: Author should not in general submit the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently. It is also expected that the author will not publish redundant manuscripts or manuscripts describing same research in more than one journal. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Multiple publications arising from a single research project should be clearly identified as such and the primary publication should be referenced.
4. Acknowledgement of Sources: Authors should acknowledge all sources of data used in the research and cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work. Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given.
5. Authorship of the Paper: The authorship of research publications should accurately reflect individuals’ contributions to the work and its reporting. Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to conception, design, execution or interpretation of the reported study. Others who have made significant contribution must be listed as co-authors. In cases where major contributors are listed as authors while those who made less substantial, or purely technical, contributions to the research or to the publication are listed in an acknowledgement section. Authors also ensure that all the authors have seen and agreed to the submitted version of the manuscript and their inclusion of names as co-authors.
6. Fundamental Errors in Published Works: If the author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in the submitted manuscript, then the author should promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.
7. Hazards and Human or Animal Subjects: The author should clearly identify in the manuscript if the work involves chemicals, procedures or equipment that have any unusual hazards inherent in their use.

Duties of Editor

1. Publication Decisions: Based on the review report of the editorial board, the editor can accept, reject, or request modifications to the manuscript. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision. Editors have to take responsibility for everything they publish and should have procedures and policies in place to ensure the quality of the material they publish and maintain the integrity of the published record.
2. Review of Manuscripts: Editor must ensure that each manuscript is initially evaluated by the editor for originality. The editor should organize and use peer review fairly and wisely. Editors should explain their peer review processes in the information for authors and also indicate which parts of the journal are peer reviewed. Editor should use appropriate peer reviewers for papers that are considered for publication by selecting people with sufficient expertise and avoiding those with conflicts of interest.
3. Fair Play: The editor must ensure that each manuscript received by the journal is reviewed for its intellectual content without regard to sex, gender, race, religion, citizenship, etc. of the authors. An important part of the responsibility to make fair and unbiased decisions is the upholding of the principle of editorial independence and integrity. Editors are in a powerful position by making decisions on publications, which makes it very important that this process is as fair and unbiased as possible.
4. Confidentiality: The editor must ensure that information regarding manuscripts submitted by the authors is kept confidential. Editors should critically assess any potential breaches of data protection and patient confidentiality. This includes requiring properly informed consent for the actual research presented, consent for publication where applicable.
5. Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest: The editor of the Journal will not use unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript for his own research without written consent of the author. Editors should not be involved in decisions about papers in which they have a conflict of interest.

Duties of Reviewers

1. Confidentiality: Information regarding manuscripts submitted by authors should be kept confidential and be treated as privileged information. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.
2. Acknowledgement of Sources: Reviewers must ensure that authors have acknowledged all sources of data used in the research. Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. The reviewers should notify the journal immediately if they come across any irregularities, have concerns about ethical aspects of the work, are aware of substantial similarity between the manuscript and a concurrent submission to another journal or a published article, or suspect that misconduct may have occurred during either the research or the writing and submission of the manuscript; reviewers should, however, keep their concerns confidential and not personally investigate further unless the journal asks for further information or advice.
3. Standards of Objectivity: Review of submitted manuscripts must be done objectively and the reviewers should express their views clearly with supporting arguments. The reviewers should follow journals’ instructions on the specific feedback that is required of them and, unless there are good reasons not to. The reviewers should be constructive in their reviews and provide feedback that will help the authors to improve their manuscript. The reviewer should make clear which suggested additional investigations are essential to support claims made in the manuscript under consideration and which will just strengthen or extend the work
4. Disclosure and Conflict of Interest: Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage.  Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers. In the case of double-blind review, if they suspect the identity of the author(s) notify the journal if this knowledge raises any potential conflict of interest.
5. Promptness: The reviewers should respond in a reasonable time-frame. The reviewers only agree to review a manuscript if they are fairly confident they can return a review within the proposed or mutually agreed time-frame, informing the journal promptly if they require an extension. In the event that a reviewer feels it is not possible for him/her to complete review of manuscript within stipulated time then this information must be communicated to the editor, so that the manuscript could be sent to another reviewer.

Publication Policy

Publication Policy

BULETIN KESLINGMAS (ISSN: 0215 -742X) is a peer-reviewed journal published by Jurusan Kesehatan Lingkungan Purwokerto, Poltekkes Semarang. This statement clarifies ethical behaviour of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in this journal, including the author, the chief editor, the Editorial Board, the peer-reviewer­­­­­ and the publisher. This statement is based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.

Ethical Guideline for Journal Publication

The publication of an article in a peer-reviewed BULETIN KESLINGMAS  journal is an essential building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is therefore important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the journal editor, the peer reviewer, the publisher and the society.  

Jurusan Kesehatan Lingkungan as publisher of BULETIN KESLINGMAS journal takes its duties of guardianship over all stages of publishing extremely seriously and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities. We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint or other commercial revenue
has no impact or influence on editorial decisions. In addition, the Jurusan Kesehatan Lingkungan and Editorial Board will assist in
communications with other journals and/or publishers where this is useful and
necessary.

Publication decisions

The editor of the BULETIN KESLINGMAS journal is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

Fair play

An editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.

Confidentiality

The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest

Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.

Duties of Reviewers

Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.

Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.

Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.

Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

Duties of Authors

Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behaviour and are unacceptable.

Authors are asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review, and should be prepared to provide public access to such data (consistent with the ALPSP-STM Statement on Data and Databases), if practicable, and should in any event be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.

The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.

An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.

Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

If the work involves chemicals, procedures or equipment that have any unusual hazards inherent in their use, the author must clearly identify these in the manuscript.

All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.

When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.

Author Publication Fees

Mulai terbitan Vol.43 No. 2 Tahun 2024, Jurnal Buletin Keslingmas menerapkan tarif pada artikel yang diterbitkan berdasarkan Surat Keputusan Direktur Poltekkes Kemenkes Semarang

Buletin Keslingmas (p-ISSN : 0215-742X, e-ISSN : 2655-8033 ), diterbitkan oleh Jurusan Kesehatan Lingkungan Politeknik Kesehatan Kemenkes Semarang Jl Raya Baturaden Km. 12 Purwokerto, Jawa Tengah, Indonesia. Telp/Fax. 0281-681709

Email : buletinkeslingmas@poltekkes-smg.ac.id

Buletin Keslingmas is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License