Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Jurnal LINK (e-ISSN: 1829-5754), menerima artikel-artikel yang berasal dari penerapan hasil riset dan teknologi tepat guna kepada masyarakat. ruang lingkup dari LINK adalah sebagai berikut:

  • Keperawatan
  • Kebidanan
  • Radiodiagnostik dan Radioterapi
  • Keperawatan Gigi
  • Ilmu Gizi
  • Kesehatan Lingkungan
  • Analis Kesehatan
  • Rekam Medis dan Informasi Kesehatan yang berfokus pada manajemen kesehatan atau issu terkini.

The journal LINK (e-ISSN: 1829-5754), accept articles that are derived from the results of applied research and appropriate technology to the community. The Scope of LINK is as follows:

  • Nursing journals
  • Obstetrics journal
  • Dental nursing journals
  • Journal radiodiagnostic and radiotherapy techniques
  • Nutrition Journal
  • Health analysts journals
  • Journal of environmental health
  • Journal of medical records and health information which focuses on health management or current issues.

 

Section Policies

Articles

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

Artikel yang diserahkan ke Jurnal LINK (e-ISSN: 1829-5754) akan dievaluasi melalui 2 tahap tinjauan, pra-review dan review substansi.

Pra-review artikel ini dilakukan oleh tim editorial untuk meninjau kesesuaian artikel dengan fokus dan ruang lingkup jurnal serta gaya selingkung jurnal dan pedoman penulisan LINK.

Review Substansi secara single-blind dilakukan oleh setidaknya 2 reviewer. Durasi peninjauan antara 3-12 minggu. Jika diinginkan, peninjau dapat meminta peninjauan ulang setelah penulis merevisi artikelnya.

Dalam proses Penerbitan Jurnal Ilmiah dilakukan melalui beberapa tahapan yaitu:

  1. Pengumpulan makalah
  2. Proses evaluasi makalah oleh reviewer yang ditunjuk
  3. Proses revisi makalah
  4. Pengeditan makalah yang telah dinyatakan Accepted
  5. Pengiriman hasil penyuntingan makalah kepada penulis untuk dilakukan proof read
  6. Permintaan Assignment of Copyright dari penulis
  7. Penerbitan jurnal ilmiah

Secara rinci, prosesnya adalah sebagai berikut :

  1. Memasukkan data paper ke database
  2. Mencetak lembar disposisi
  3. Membuat arsip paper
  4. Menentukan Reviewer paper
  5. Mengirimkan paper ke referee untuk dievaluasi.
  6. Mengirimkan pemberitahuan kepada penulis.
  7. Mengirimkan referee report ke penulis untuk direvisi.
  8. Meminta komentar lanjutan dai reviewer atas paper hasil revisi.
  9. Jika paper masih harus direvisi, komentar lanjutan dikirimkan ke penulis.
  10. Melakukan penyuntingan paper sesuai dengan format Proceedings.
  11. Mengirimkan paper ke penulis untuk dilakukan final reading.
  12. Melakukan final editing.
  13. Menerbitkan jurnal.

 

Articles submitted to Jurnal LINK (e-ISSN: 1829-5754) will be evaluated through 2 stages of review, pre-review and substance review.

The pre-review of the article is done by the editorial team to review the conformity of the article with the focus and scope of the journal as well as the journal style and specific LINK writing guidelines.

Substantial single-blind reviews are performed by at least 2 reviewers. Duration of review between 3-12 weeks. If desired, the reviewer may request a re-review after the author revises his/her article.

  1. In the process of Scientific Journal Issuance is carried out through several stages, namely:
  2. Collection of papers
  3. Paper evaluation process by the designated reviewer
  4. Paper revision process
  5. Editing papers that have been declared Accepted
  6. Delivery of the results of editing the paper to the author for proofreading
  7. Assignment of Copyright Request from the author
  8. Publishing scientific journals

In detail, the process is as follows:

  1. Enter data paper into the database
  2. Print a disposition sheet
  3. Make a paper archive
  4. Determine the Reviewer paper
  5. Send paper to the referee for evaluation.
  6. Send notification to the author.
  7. Sending report referee to the author for revision.
  8. Request further comments from the reviewer on the revised paper.
  9. If the paper still has to be revised, further comments are sent to the author.
  10. Editing the paper in accordance with the Proceedings format.
  11. Submitting the paper to the author for final reading.
  12. Do the final editing.
  13. Publish a journal.

Review Guidelines

 

 

Publication Frequency

Jurnal LINK terbit 2 kali pada bulan Mei dan November setiap tahunnya.

 

Open Access Policy

Jurnal ini menyediakan akses terbuka langsung ke konten pada prinsip bahwa melakukan penelitian tersedia secara bebas untuk umum mendukung pertukaran global yang lebih besar pengetahuan.

This journal provides open access to content in essence which can be used for globalization.

Biaya Proses Artikel

Jurnal LINK (e-ISSN: 2461-1077) adalah jurnal akses terbuka. Pengajuan penulis, serta pemrosesan artikel dan penerbitan, tidak dipungut biaya. Pembaca dapat membaca dan mengunduh artikel teks lengkap secara gratis.

Article Processing Charge

Jurnal LINK (e-ISSN: 2461-1077) is an open access journal. Author submission, as well as article processing and publishing, is free of charge. Readers can read and download any full-text articles for free of charge.


 

Publication Ethics

Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement

LINK (ISSN: 1829-5754)  is a peer-reviewed journal published by UPPM Politeknik Kesehatan Kemenkes Semarang. This statement  clarifies ethical behaviour of all parties involved in the act of  publishing an article in this journal, including the author, the chief  editor, the Editorial Board, the peer-reviewer­­­­­ and the publisher. This statement is based on COPE’s Best Practice  Guidelines for Journal Editors.

Ethical Guideline for Journal Publication

The publication of an article in a peer-reviewed LINK journal is an  essential building block in the development of a coherent and respected  network of knowledge. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the  work of the authors and the institutions that support them.  Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is  therefore important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior  for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the  journal editor, the peer reviewer, the publisher and the society.

UPPM Politeknik Kesehatan Kemenkes Semarang as publisher of LINK journal takes its duties of guardianship  over all stages of publishing extremely seriously and we recognize our  ethical and other responsibilities. We are committed to ensuring that  advertising, reprint or other commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions. In addition, the UPPM Politeknik Kesehatan Kemenkes Semarang and Editorial Board will assist in communications with other journals and/or publishers where this is useful and necessary.

Publication decisions

The editor of the LINK journal is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to  the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question  and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such  decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's  editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then  be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The  editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this  decision.

Fair play

An editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual  content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious  belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the  authors.

Confidentiality

The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information  about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding  author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and  the publisher, as appropriate.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest

Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be  used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of  the author.

Duties of Reviewers

Contribution to Editorial Decisions

Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and  through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the  author in improving the paper.

Promptness

Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research  reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be  impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review  process.

Confidentiality

Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential  documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as  authorized by the editor.

Standards of Objectivity

Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the  author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly  with supporting arguments.

Acknowledgement of Sources

Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been  cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or  argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the  relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention  any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under  consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal  knowledge.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be  kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should  not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest  resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or  connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions  connected to the papers.

Duties of Authors

Reporting standards

Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate  account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its  significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the  paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit  others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate  statements constitute unethical behaviour and are unacceptable.

Data Access and Retention

Authors are asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper  for editorial review, and should be prepared to provide public access to  such data (consistent with the ALPSP-STM Statement on Data and  Databases), if practicable, and should in any event be prepared to  retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.

Originality and Plagiarism

The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original  works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that  this has been appropriately cited or quoted.

Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication

An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing  essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary  publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal  concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is  unacceptable.

Acknowledgement of Sources

Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given.  Authors should cite publications that have been influential in  determining the nature of the reported work.

Authorship of the Paper

Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant  contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of  the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions  should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have  participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project,  they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors.  The  corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and  no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all  co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and  have agreed to its submission for publication.

Hazards and Human or Animal Subjects

If the work involves chemicals, procedures or equipment that have any  unusual hazards inherent in their use, the author must clearly identify  these in the manuscript.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or  other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to  influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources  of financial support for the project should be disclosed.

Fundamental errors in published works

When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her  own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify  the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract  or correct the paper.