.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png){kind=spacer}
.png)
Evaluasi Kualitas Radiograf Periapikal Teknik Bisektris : Kesalahan Penempatan Sudut Penyinaran dan Film
Abstract
Background: The bisecting angle technique of periapical radiography is more often used in dental practice because the technique is practically adjustable and the patient's ability to adapt is better. Radiograph results are influenced by operator and patient factors, so management that is not optimal can cause a decrease in the quality of the radiograph, which affects interpretation, diagnosis, and treatment planning. The study aimed to determine the quality and frequency of errors in periapical radiographs using the bisecting technique due to errors in X-ray angulation and film placement at the Soelastri Dental and Oral Hospital (RSGM), University of Muhammadiyah Surakarta (UMS).
Methods: The type of research is descriptive observational quantitative research with a retrospective approach. A total of 300 bisecting technique periapical radiographs from patients at RSGM Soelastri UMS in January–December 2021 who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were taken in random stratification and evaluated. Radiographs are compared to ideal quality and given a National Radiological Protection Board (NRPB) rating, as well as looking at the frequency of errors that occur.
Results: The rating most often obtained on periapical radiographs using the bisecting technique in the study was 2 for 181 radiographs (60.33%). The frequency of X-ray angulation errors was 62.94%, while the frequency of film placement errors was 37.06%. The highest error in X-ray angulation was cone cutting at 49.13%, while the error in film placement was in the form of apical cuts at 25.65%.
Conclusions: The quality of periapical radiographs using the bisecting technique at the Radiology Installation at RSGM Soelastri UMS in the period January to December 2021 generally has a rating of 2 (diagnostically acceptable) according to the NRPB, and errors are still found in the angulation of the X-ray tube and film placement.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Acharya, S., Pai, K., & Acharya, S. (2015). Repeat film analysis and its implications for quality assurance in dental radiology: An institutional case study. Contemporary Clinical Dentistry, 6(3), 392–395. https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-237X.161898
Al Salami, A., Halabi, M., Hussein, I., Kowash, M., Salami, A., & Al Halabi, M. (2017). An Audit on the Quality of Intra-Oral Digital Radiographs Taken in a Postgraduate Paediatric Dentistry Setting Hall technique in child patients View project General anaesthesia and dentistry. February.
Ali, S. A., Hussain, M., Shahzad, M., & Irfan, F. (2018). Quality Analysis of Periapical Radiographs Taken by Dental Assistants. Journal of Liaquat University of Medical & Health Sciences, 17(04), 260–264.
Anggara, A., Iswani, R., & Darmawangsa, D. (2018). Perubahan sudut penyinaran vertikal pada bisecting tecnique radiography terhadap keakuratan dimensi panjang gigi premolar satu atas. B-Dent: Jurnal Kedokteran Gigi Universitas Baiturrahmah, 5(1), 1–8.
Bhatti, U. D. , N. A. R. , T. A. , R. I. , & S. G. M. (2020). Common radiographic errors in dentistry. Acta Scientific Dental Sciences, 4(3), 1–4.
Damayanti, M. A., Firman, R. N., & Sitam, S. (2020). Teknik “Clark’s Rule” dalam bidang Kedokteran Gigi. Jurnal Radiologi Dentomaksilofasial Indonesia (JRDI), 3(3), 13. https://doi.org/10.32793/jrdi.v3i3.440
Elangovan, S. , M. M. N. , J. S. , K. B. S. , & R. D. (2016). Faulty Radiographs: a Cross-Sectional Analysis Among Dental College Students in Namakkal District, Tamil Nadu, India. J Pharm Bioall Sci, 8(1), s116-8.
Ersan, N. , D. S. , F. E. , & İ. D. (2016). Evaluation of digital periapical radiographs obtained by dental students. Yeditepe Dental Journal, 12.
Ersan, N., Dölekoğlu, Z. S., Fişekçioğlu, E., & İlgüy, D. (2016). Evaluation of digital periapical radiographs obtained by dental students. Yeditepe Dental Journal, 12(3), 7–10. https://doi.org/10.5505/yeditepe.2016.96168
Gopal, K. S. , K. N. , & P. M. (2018). Faulty radiographs: A retrospective radiographic analysis. Int J Applied Dent Sc, 4, 72–76.
Hasan, A. , N. F. , A. S. A. , K. J. A. , & A. B. (2019). Technical Errors in Intra Oral Radiographs Obtained in Endodontic Department of A Teaching Dental Hospital. Journal of the Pakistan Dental Association, 28(2).
Hasan, A., Ali, S. A., Khan, J. A., & Batool Ali, B. (2019). Technical Errors in Intra Oral Radiographs Obtained in Endodontic Department of A Teaching Dental Hospital. Journal of the Pakistan Dental Association, 28(02), 50–54. https://doi.org/10.25301/jpda.282.50
Javed, M. Q. , K. S. H. , R. A. , & N. S. (2020). Quality assurance audit of digital intraoral periapical radiographs at the undergraduate dental clinics. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak, 30(12), 1339–1342.
Khan, A., Javed, M. Q., Iqbal, R., Khan, F., & Habib, S. R. (2020). Quality assurance audit of intra-oral periapical radiographs at the undergraduate dental school. Journal of Ayub Medical College Abbottabad, 32(3), 327–330.
Khoironi, E., Firman, R. N., Azhari, A., & Oscandar, F. (2017). Determination of pulp necrosis based on periapical digital radiography histogram and pulp histopathology. Padjadjaran Journal of Dentistry, 29(3).
Lintag, K., Bruhn, A. M., Tolle, S. L., & Diawara, N. (2019). Radiation safety practices of dental hygienists in the United States. American Dental Hygienists’ Association, 93(4), 14–23.
Mori, M., Ariji, Y., Fukuda, M., Kitano, T., Funakoshi, T., Nishiyama, W., Kohinata, K., Iida, Y., Ariji, E., & Katsumata, A. (2022). Performance of deep learning technology for evaluation of positioning quality in periapical radiography of the maxillary canine. Oral Radiology, 38(1), 147–154.
Permatahati, A., Firman, R. N., & Pramanik, F. (2019). Kualitas radiograf periapikal dengan teknik bisektris The quality of periapical radiograph with the bisecting technique. Padjadjaran Journal of Dental Researchers and Students, 3(2), 82–86.
Ramadhan, A. Z., Sitam, S., Azhari, A., & Epsilawati, L. (2020). Gambaran kualitas dan mutu radiograf. Jurnal Radiologi Dentomaksilofasial Indonesia (JRDI), 3(3), 43–48.
Reddy, K., Tatapudi, R., Reddy, R., Kumar, C., Teja, T., & Swathi, G. (2019). Assessment of linear measurements with intra oral grid on intra oral periapical image - A comparison of digital and conventional film images using bisecting angle and paralleling techniques. Journal of Indian Academy of Oral Medicine and Radiology, 31(4), 339–345. https://doi.org/10.4103/jiaomr.jiaomr_201_19
Salami, A., Al Halabi, M., Hussein, I., & Kowash, M. (2017). An audit on the quality of intra-oral digital radiographs taken in a postgraduate Paediatric Dentistry setting. OHDM, 16(1), 1–4.
Septina, F., & Reyvaldo, R. (2020). Perbedaan kualitas hasil radiograf periapikal antara film konvensional dan film instan di Instalasi Radiologi FKG Universitas Brawijaya Malang. Jurnal Radiologi Dentomaksilofasial Indonesia (JRDI), 4(1), 45–49.
Shivanandappa, S. G. , M. L. , & K. G. (2014). Persistent Radiographic Cone Cuts: A Simple Test to Avoid the Frustrating Problem. Indian J Dent Res, 539–540.
Shukla, A. K. (2019). Medical Imaging Methods: Recent Trends. Springer.
Takeshita, W. M., Iwaki, L. C. V., Da Silva, M. C., & Tonin, R. H. (2014). Evaluation of diagnostic accuracy of conventional and digital periapical radiography, panoramic radiography, and cone-beam computed tomography in the assessment of alveolar bone loss. Contemporary Clinical Dentistry, 5(3), 318.
Whaites, E., & Drage, N. (2013). Essentials of dental radiography and radiology. Elsevier Health Sciences.
Widyastuti, N. H., & Suparno, N. R. (2019). Diagnosis Kedokteran Gigi. Surakarta: Muhammadiyah University Press.
Yueniwati, Y., Rachmawati, Y. L., & Prismahany, I. P. (2021). Apical Cuts off as the Highest Prevalence of Errors during the Process of Periapical Radiograph Bisecting Technique by Dentistry Students. Indones Med Life Sci J, 1(1), 8–14.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31983/jimed.v10i1.10554
Article Metrics
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
JURNAL IMEJING DIAGNOSTIK by http://ejournal.poltekkes-smg.ac.id/ojs/index.php/jimed is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.