Analisis Informasi Anatomi Pemeriksaan MRI Ankle Joint pada Penggunaan Foot Ankle Coil dan Flex Coil Proton Density Fat Saturation Irisan Sagital
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31983/jimed.v10i1.10268Keywords:
MRI Ankle Joint, Foot Ankle Coil, Flex CoilAbstract
Background: To get good MRI image quality, a special coil is designed according to the type of examination with various types and sizes so that it can be adjusted to the body to be examined so that the selection of coil is very important in MRI examination. At Dr.R.Soeharso Surakarta Orthopedi Hospital, it was found on an MRI examination of the ankle joint using a foot ankle coil and also sometimes also using a flex coil. The purpose of this study was to determine the difference in anatomical information of ankle joint MRI examination on Proton Density Fat Saturation Sagittal Slices using foot ankle coil and flex coil.  Â
Methods: This research is quantitative research with an experimental approach. This research was conducted on 10 volunteers. Respondents assessed image information on the anatomy of the Achilles tendon, talocalcaneal ligament, tibiofibular ligament, talofibular ligament, talotibial ligament, tenton flexor digitorum, extensor digitorum tendon, os calcaneus, os tallus, os tibia.Â
Results: Ten probandus were performed MRI examination of ankle joint, proton density weighting, sagittal slice using foot ankle coil and flex coil. Images are produced that can show predetermined anatomical information, namely: Achilles tendon, talocalcaneal ligament, tibiofibular ligament, talofibular ligament, talotibial ligament, tenton flexor digitorum, extensor digitorum tendon, os calcaneus, os tallus, os tibia. Based on Wilcoxon's nonparametric statistical test in table shows that the resulting p value is 0.001 (p-value is <0.05) which means that there is a significant difference in the overall anatomical information of ankle joint MRI examination on the use of foot ankle coil and flex coil proton density fat saturation sagittal slices and mean rank results (28.50) foot ankle coil (0,001) flex coil.
Conclusions: The anatomical information produced in the use of foot ankle coil is better than the anatomical information produced by flex coil on MRI examination of ankle joint proton density fat saturation sagittal slice.
Downloads
References
Angela Chang, by B., Lockard MS, C. A., Ferrari, M. B., Clanton, T. O., & Ho, C. P. (2018). Cuboid Navicular Tarsal Coalition: Presentation and Evaluation with Emphasis on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Appearance. The Foot & Ankle Online Journal. https://doi.org/10.3827/faoj.2018.1101.0006
Bartalini, L. (2022). How to Perform an Ankle MR Examination Without a Dedicated Coil: The Combined Head/Neck-Flex Coil Technique.
Choo, H. J., Lee, S. J., Kim, D. W., Jeong, H. W., & Gwak, H. (2014). Multibanded Anterior Talofibular Ligaments in Normal Ankles and Sprained Ankles Using 3D Isotropic Proton Density-Weighted Fast Spin-Echo MRI Sequence. American Journal of Roentgenology, 202(1). https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.13.10727
Grande, F. Del, Santini, F., Herzka, D. A., Aro, M. R., Dean, C. W., Gold, G. E., & Carrino, J. A. (2014). Fat-Suppression Techniques for 3-T MR Imaging of the Musculoskeletal System. Radiographics, 34(1), 217–233. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.341135130
Hayter, C. L., Linklater, J. M., & Man, K. H. (2014). State of the Art MR Imaging Techniques for the Foot and Ankle. In Current Radiology Reports (Vol. 2, Issue 4). Springer New York LLC. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40134-014-0042-3
Kartawiguna, D. (2015). Tomografi Resonansi Magnetik (Cetakan 1). Graha Ilmu.
Ray, R. G. (2016). Arthroscopic Anatomy of the Ankle Joint. Clinics in Podiatric Medicine and Surgery, 33(4), 467–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpm.2016.06.001
Siriwanarangsun, P., Bae, W. C., Statum, S., & Chung, C. B. (2017). Advanced MRI Techniques for the Ankle. American Journal of Roentgenology, 209(3), 511–524. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.17.18057
Vaughan, T., & Grifftihs. (2012). RF Coils for MRI. Wiley.
Warrens, M. J. (2015). Five Ways to Look at Cohen⠀ ™s Kappa. Journal of Psychology & Psychotherapy, 05(04), 8–11. https://doi.org/10.4172/2161-0487.1000197
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png){kind=spacer}
.png)
