THE ANALYSIS RELATED VARIATION SLICE THICKNESS TO IMAGE INFORMATION RECONSTRUCTION MAXIMUM INTENSITY PROJECTION (MIP) MSCT ABDOMINAL ANGIOGRAPHY IN THE HOSPITAL TELOGOREJO SEMARANG

Yeti Kartikasari, Nurdopo Baskoro, Muhammad Erfansyah, Anik Setyowati

Abstract


The Research of this study was to determine the relationship of slice thickness to Maximum Intensity Projection (MIP) reconstructive image information and determine the exact slice thickness to the MIP processing of MSCT examination of Abdominal Angiography. Type of research is quantitative with an experimental approach, using a sample of 6 patients. Each patient performed a MIP reconstruction of the abdominal artery that is truncus coeliacs artery, gastric artery, hepatic artery, splenic artery, superior mesenteric artery, inferior mesenteric artery, renal artery, and communis iliac artery with variations in slice thickness of 5, 10, 15, 20 and 25 mm. Correlation test results produce a P-value= 0.001 smaller than α= 0.05 so that Ho is rejected and Ha is accepted, which means there is a relationship between slice thickness with image information on the MIP processing of abdominal arteries. Correlation coefficient value obtained is 0.593 so that the relationship obtained is moderate. The negative relationship is that the smaller the slice thickness, the diagnostic information on the abdominal artery is clearer, the greater the slice thickness, the diagnostic information generated is increasingly unclear. MIP reconstruction of the abdominal artery can produce clear image information on 5 mm and 10 mm.


Keywords


maximum intensity projection (MIP) ; artery abdominal ; slice thickness ; msct abdominal angiography

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bae T Kyongtae. 2006, Principles of Contrast Medium Delivery and Scan Timing in MDCT. MDTCA Practical A. Springer New York USA.

Bongartz G. S.J. Golding, A.G. Jurik, M. Leonardi, et al 2004, European Guidelines for Multislice Computed Tomography. Funded by the European Commission.

Bontrager, Kenneth L. 2014, Textbook of Positioning and Related Anatomy, 8th Edition. CV. Mosby Company, St. Louis.

Bushberg. J.T. 2003, The Essential Physics Of Medical Imaging, Second Edition. Philadelphia. USA.

Corey Goldman & Javier Sanz, 2007. CT Angiography of the Abdominal Aorta and Its Branches with Protocol. Informa healthcare. Chennai.

Gibson, John. 2002, Fisiologi dan Anatomi Modern untuk Perawat. EGC: Jakarta.

Holalkere, NS, et al. 2011. 64-Slice Multidetector Row CT Abdomen of the Abdomen. Department of Radiology, Boston, USA.

Lipson, Scott. 2006. MDCT and 3 D Workstation. Springer New York: USA.

Nagel, HD. 2004. Fundamental of neuroimaging. WB Saunders Company: Philadelphia the USA.

Pearce, Evelyne C. 2011. Anatomy dan Fisiologi Untuk Paramedis. Gramedia: Jakarta.

Pelberg, Robert. 2015. Cardiac Angiography Manual. Second Edition. Springer New York USA.

Rasad, S, et al. 2006. Radiologi Diagnostik. Balai penerbit FKUI RSCM: Jakarta.

Seeram, Euclid, RT (R), BSc., MSc., FCAMRT., 2009. Computed Tomography Physical Principle, clinical Application, and Quality Control. 3rd Edition. W.B. Saunders Company, London.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31983/jrk.v8i2.5366

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2019 Jurnal Riset Kesehatan

Jurnal Riset Kesehatan (ISSN: 2252-5068 e-ISSN: 2461-1026), is published by Pusat Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat, Poltekkes Kemenkes Semarang, Jl. Tirto Agung, Pedalangan, Banyumanik, Semarang, Jawa Tengah 50268, Indonesia; Telp./Fax: (024)7460274

Public Services : 

 E-mail: jrk@poltekkes-smg.ac.id 


View statistics


Creative Commons License Jurnal Riset Kesehatan is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.